OK. So my wife has deserted me to go cut up pictures at some lakehouse. Do I sit around and mope, dejectedly pondering where we could have gone for dinner tonight? Do I sit around, thumbing through photo albums, relishing memories of special days gone by? NOPE!!!! I watch Manchester United destroy Arsenal first thing this morning, take my son to his soccer game and then head for Friar Tucks!!!!! Which leads to the next topic: Saturday Night Beer Fights!
And off we go...
BEER #1
Brewer: Cathedral Square (Their slogan is turning sinners into saints)
Beer Name: Iglesia Agave Golden Ale
Beer Style: Blonde Ale
Price: $3.99 for a pint
Before I begin, I want to say this was a big stride for me as I hate tequila. As in wouldn't drink it unless a lot of $ was on the table; like a briefcase full... and not ones either. That being said, I was in the mood for light beer tonight as I have the kids (as mentioned in the opening paragraph). I almost saved it for the second beer so my taste buds would be slightly dulled but I decided to man up.
OK, that being said, I can continue.
AROMA: Beery with a hint of tequila. Really, if it would have been overwhelming, I couldn't have done it but luckily, this isn't Cuervo with bubbles... Not too strong but you can tell the Agave plant is hiding in the bottom, ready to lash out and get you.
MOUTHFEEL: Good actually. It has a pleasant buzz on the tongue which feels like beer and not the thick syrupy nasty tequila feel. I am actually surprised that I am enjoying this so far. As in SHOCKED.
TASTE: I was expecting to vomit as soon as I tilted the glass past the 90 degree level and the first drop touched my bottom lip so when that didn't happen, i actually had to pay attention to the taste. And, it isn't bad. Definitely a hint of tequila there but that is it. Just a touch, a hint, an intimation if you will bear with my poetic rambling here. I don't know if I would say this is good; just a little different and I can't complain. I'm going to have to get someone who likes tequila to drink this. It may be the next Lime-A-Rita!!! Easy Weable! Not insinuating it will take a small chunk of InBev's market share. Overall, I'm impressed that the brewer didn't overdo it as so many do. Now, if only they could do the same thing with Pumpkin beer, I might find one I like... Oh well, another day.
OVERALL RATING: I'm going a solid 3.0 with a disclaimer. I don't like Agave so finding one I could drink and not belch vomit is a huge success. This probably deserves higher for the skill the brewer showed but I'm going with my opinion over logic.
By the way, I just finished the entire pint. In about 45 minutes. Is it time for the boys to go to bed yet?
Started the first fire of the season tonight. The basement is toasty. Whoever invented fire should be president.
Another side note, the Swish and I are going to see Chevelle at Pops on December 7. Talk about a throwback for me. I haven't been to Pops and am not sure if they will let me drink with an over 40 discount. Our wives, who know nothing about Chevelle are going too. I'm betting by the fourth song, they are waiting in the mini van while Lonnie and I rock the F out of the place. And chances are, I may have enough in me to not worry too much about that... One can only hope.
Anyway, on to BEER #2.
Brewer: Bat Creek
Beer Name: Midwest Farmer's Daughter Blonde Ale (slogan is "I wish they all could be that good")
Beer Style: Blonde Ale
Price: $4.99 pint
AROMA: Wow. Sent shivers down my spine. Very fruity with something else. Not sure yet. Maybe the hops? Not a very traditional hop smell though.
MOUTHFEEL: Very light. Although quite a feeling in the aftertaste. The burn lasted at least 20 seconds after the beer was gone. Quite an impression. Ahhhh. Just read the label. 7%. Now its becoming clearer, or foggier... In the words of the immortal Big Daddy Kane, "Imma play like Roy Rogers and slooooooooow dooowwnnn."
TASTE: Surprisingly light for 7%. Surprisingly good for a 7% blonde ale. Usually the two don't go together. Had I read the label before buying, I may not have purchased this as I'm home alone with the kids. Remember, this is all in the name of research!
OVERALL RATING: 2.5 here. Not a lot too it besides the alcohol. I'm slightly disappointed. Just a touch of cough syrup infused with some fruity flavors. Not a repurchase by any means.
Off to play some Halo Reach with Kevin. Can't wait for Halo 4 Tuesday. Until next time...
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Saturday, September 8, 2012
SEC Opener Beer Blog! Go Tigers!
Ahhhh, after the busiest summer I have ever had, things are finally settling down. I found leaves in the swimming pool today and the temperature never got out of the 70's. Football starts in earnest this weekend and it feels like a good excuse to drink some beer. Mizzou is opening up their SEC schedule against 7th ranked Georgia and I decided to get the blog going again. Life is returning to normal...
On to the beers: I picked two dark beers to mirror the black jerseys that I hoped Mizzou would wear (and they wore yellow of course). I like the new unis; much different unis then we have ever seen:
The football references don't stop there though. The first beer is a stout- as in Mizzou's defense. STOUT. It is a Tallgrass Buffalo Sweat Oatmeal Cream Stout to be exact. I have had it on tap before and enjoyed it so I thought it would be good to blog about. The second beer is new to me. It is a Green Flash Double Stout Black Ale. DOUBLE STOUT. Like Mizzou's DEFENSE!
The game is about to begin as is the beer competition as well. I am going to drink one of the Buffalo Sweat cans first.
Brewer: Tallgrass
Beer Name: Buffalo Sweat Oatmeal Cream Stout
Beer Style: Cream Stout
Price: about $8 for four 16 oz cans at Schnucks in Wentzville
Appearance: Dark, creamy, looks like coffee with some black food coloring dumped in. Looks like a stout should.
Mouthfeel: Very prickly; buzzes in your mouth. A lively, bubbly feel. Definitely not watery or boring.
Aroma: Not much actually. I tried to smell it during Mizzou's 2nd 3 and out but never got anything. Weird for a beer with this much flavor.
Taste: Absolutely delicious. I remembered being a fan of this when I had it at ITap. If this beer was a chick, it would look like Halle Berry (ten years ago), sing like Beyonce, and score goals like Alex Morgan. It is a cross between black licorice, carmel, and coffee dumped in your favorite black ale. Outstanding. A super beer here. 16 ounces of love.
Overall rating: 4.75 with the only drawback being I haven't drank enough to go 5 even. It may get there by the time I finish this entry.
By the way, Mizzou's offense looks terrible and the defense looks dominant. 0-0 in first quarter.
On to the next beer.
Brewer: Green Flash
Beer Name: Double Stout Black Ale
Beer Style: Stout
Price: About $8 for a four pack of 12 ounce bottles at Schnucks in Wentzville.
Appearance: Dark, darker, darkest. Almost pitch black. Picture Cory's last three girlfriends; just a little lighter.
Mouthfeel: Very bubbly as well; a small avalanche of effervesence on your tounge.
Aroma: Smells very bitter; almost a sour smell; possibly yeast but not sure. Very pungent.
Taste: A completely different beer. It is a stout, very distinct taste, way more bitter then the first, not nearly as smooth but still good. It has gotten much better as it warmed up. More coffee and less licorice for sure. Not nearly as complex as the Buffalo Sweat but not bad overall.
Overall rating: 3. Could be a little less bitter with a littlebut more taste. Glad I tried it but I probably won't buy again.
Go Tigers!!!
Look for more blog entries as the weather cools and my pool project draws to a close.
On to the beers: I picked two dark beers to mirror the black jerseys that I hoped Mizzou would wear (and they wore yellow of course). I like the new unis; much different unis then we have ever seen:
The football references don't stop there though. The first beer is a stout- as in Mizzou's defense. STOUT. It is a Tallgrass Buffalo Sweat Oatmeal Cream Stout to be exact. I have had it on tap before and enjoyed it so I thought it would be good to blog about. The second beer is new to me. It is a Green Flash Double Stout Black Ale. DOUBLE STOUT. Like Mizzou's DEFENSE!
The game is about to begin as is the beer competition as well. I am going to drink one of the Buffalo Sweat cans first.
Brewer: Tallgrass
Beer Name: Buffalo Sweat Oatmeal Cream Stout
Beer Style: Cream Stout
Price: about $8 for four 16 oz cans at Schnucks in Wentzville
Appearance: Dark, creamy, looks like coffee with some black food coloring dumped in. Looks like a stout should.
Mouthfeel: Very prickly; buzzes in your mouth. A lively, bubbly feel. Definitely not watery or boring.
Aroma: Not much actually. I tried to smell it during Mizzou's 2nd 3 and out but never got anything. Weird for a beer with this much flavor.
Taste: Absolutely delicious. I remembered being a fan of this when I had it at ITap. If this beer was a chick, it would look like Halle Berry (ten years ago), sing like Beyonce, and score goals like Alex Morgan. It is a cross between black licorice, carmel, and coffee dumped in your favorite black ale. Outstanding. A super beer here. 16 ounces of love.
Overall rating: 4.75 with the only drawback being I haven't drank enough to go 5 even. It may get there by the time I finish this entry.
By the way, Mizzou's offense looks terrible and the defense looks dominant. 0-0 in first quarter.
On to the next beer.
Brewer: Green Flash
Beer Name: Double Stout Black Ale
Beer Style: Stout
Price: About $8 for a four pack of 12 ounce bottles at Schnucks in Wentzville.
Appearance: Dark, darker, darkest. Almost pitch black. Picture Cory's last three girlfriends; just a little lighter.
Mouthfeel: Very bubbly as well; a small avalanche of effervesence on your tounge.
Aroma: Smells very bitter; almost a sour smell; possibly yeast but not sure. Very pungent.
Taste: A completely different beer. It is a stout, very distinct taste, way more bitter then the first, not nearly as smooth but still good. It has gotten much better as it warmed up. More coffee and less licorice for sure. Not nearly as complex as the Buffalo Sweat but not bad overall.
Overall rating: 3. Could be a little less bitter with a littlebut more taste. Glad I tried it but I probably won't buy again.
Go Tigers!!!
Look for more blog entries as the weather cools and my pool project draws to a close.
Saturday, March 24, 2012
Oatmeal Stout AND I MEAN STOUT
Well, I started out spring break getting pretty ripped and I plan on ending it that way as well. It is 5:30 and I have had three Bud Light Limes as I housecleaned and I am now sitting down to do another blog. Tonight, we have some beer that I bought back at the end of January but haven't drank yet (obviously). Two Oatmeal Stouts.
The first (pictured on the right) is from Mikeller Brewery in Norway. It is called Beer Geek Breakfast as it is an oatmeal stout with coffee in it as well. As I was pouring it, I think I was a little frightened as it looks like motor oil after about 10000 miles. I immediately called Kerry over for backup.
Here is the rating:
BREWER: Mikkeller (Norway)
BEER NAME: Beer Geek Breakfast
BEER STYLE: Oatmeal/ Coffee Stout
PRICE: 9.99/ pint (ouch!)
Appearance: As previously stated, it looks like Pennzoil after 10000 miles or so in the old farm tractor out back or maybe liquid charcoal. To say this beer looks imtimidating may be like saying Cristiano Ronaldo dates attractive women. The foam on top is darker than most beer I have seen. This is not messing around.
Mouthfeel: Have you ever swallowed molten lead? This is somewhat similar (I imagine).
Aroma: Smells like a combination of black licorice, coffee, and alcohol. Actually it is quite pleasing.
Taste: On first taste, you really get ran over by the coffee bitterness. After that subsides, the warmth of the alcohol takes over and leads you into the actual oat taste of the beer. This is quite a complex beer with a definite beginning, middle, and end. For supposedly being only 7.5%, this beer packs a punch on the alcohol end too. I am half way through the pint and am feeling a little more warmth then before. Looks like I'm going to need some aspirin in the morning...
Overall Rating: 4.0. Too much coffee for me but I can appreciate the taste complexity and the balance that the brewer was going for. This would be the perfect -15 degrees day on the ski slopes when you want a pint or two before bed. A word of warning, for those of you who think Guiness is a strong beer, you may want to skip this one. It is one of the most powerful beers I have ever drank. Good stuff. A definite trophy beer.
NEXT: Samuel Smith's (my boy!) Oatmeal Stout. (this is the one that most drinkers say is the most accessible if not the best Oatmeal Stout on the market). I have very high hopes for this.
BREWER: Samuel Smith, England (Might be the best brewer on the planet)
BEER NAME: Tadcaster Oatmeal Stout
Beer Style: Ummm, oatmeal stout
Price: Maybe $5.99/ pint? Around there at least.
Appearance: Dark, somewhat clear although you can't see through it due to the darkness. Good, strong head with excellent lacing. A nice looking beer. Looks like a stout that won't decrease the years off your life.
Mouthfeel: Very foamy, malty beer with a smooth feeling as it goes down. A very nice, clean stout. This is a beer that has been perfected and not messed with.
Aroma: Not a whole lot there; a slight hint of nuts maybe? Some black licorice as well? Just a good clean beer scent more then anything.
Taste: I was expecting a nice beer and I'm not disappointed. This is a beer that is dominated by the grain involved; the oat. While not resembling oatmeal that I have tasted, it makes you feel like you dipped your hand in the oat barrel and chewed on some. Very smooth with a great finish. This is about half the beer that the first one was which isn't necessarily a bad thing. This is smooth enough to drink a few pints of without feeling like you just conquered the neighboring tribe by brute force. I fully recommend it. Per the usual Sam Smith output, it is perfectly balanced and a great entrance into this particular beer style.
Overall rating: 4.75. Excellent beer. Period. I love Sam Smith. He hasn't let me down yet. I need to buy stock. Or move to Yorkshire, England and rent a room above the brewery. How many quid is that I wonder? Anyone have an extra pence or two lying around?
The first (pictured on the right) is from Mikeller Brewery in Norway. It is called Beer Geek Breakfast as it is an oatmeal stout with coffee in it as well. As I was pouring it, I think I was a little frightened as it looks like motor oil after about 10000 miles. I immediately called Kerry over for backup.
Here is the rating:
BREWER: Mikkeller (Norway)
BEER NAME: Beer Geek Breakfast
BEER STYLE: Oatmeal/ Coffee Stout
PRICE: 9.99/ pint (ouch!)
Appearance: As previously stated, it looks like Pennzoil after 10000 miles or so in the old farm tractor out back or maybe liquid charcoal. To say this beer looks imtimidating may be like saying Cristiano Ronaldo dates attractive women. The foam on top is darker than most beer I have seen. This is not messing around.
Mouthfeel: Have you ever swallowed molten lead? This is somewhat similar (I imagine).
Aroma: Smells like a combination of black licorice, coffee, and alcohol. Actually it is quite pleasing.
Taste: On first taste, you really get ran over by the coffee bitterness. After that subsides, the warmth of the alcohol takes over and leads you into the actual oat taste of the beer. This is quite a complex beer with a definite beginning, middle, and end. For supposedly being only 7.5%, this beer packs a punch on the alcohol end too. I am half way through the pint and am feeling a little more warmth then before. Looks like I'm going to need some aspirin in the morning...
Overall Rating: 4.0. Too much coffee for me but I can appreciate the taste complexity and the balance that the brewer was going for. This would be the perfect -15 degrees day on the ski slopes when you want a pint or two before bed. A word of warning, for those of you who think Guiness is a strong beer, you may want to skip this one. It is one of the most powerful beers I have ever drank. Good stuff. A definite trophy beer.
NEXT: Samuel Smith's (my boy!) Oatmeal Stout. (this is the one that most drinkers say is the most accessible if not the best Oatmeal Stout on the market). I have very high hopes for this.
BREWER: Samuel Smith, England (Might be the best brewer on the planet)
BEER NAME: Tadcaster Oatmeal Stout
Beer Style: Ummm, oatmeal stout
Price: Maybe $5.99/ pint? Around there at least.
Appearance: Dark, somewhat clear although you can't see through it due to the darkness. Good, strong head with excellent lacing. A nice looking beer. Looks like a stout that won't decrease the years off your life.
Mouthfeel: Very foamy, malty beer with a smooth feeling as it goes down. A very nice, clean stout. This is a beer that has been perfected and not messed with.
Aroma: Not a whole lot there; a slight hint of nuts maybe? Some black licorice as well? Just a good clean beer scent more then anything.
Taste: I was expecting a nice beer and I'm not disappointed. This is a beer that is dominated by the grain involved; the oat. While not resembling oatmeal that I have tasted, it makes you feel like you dipped your hand in the oat barrel and chewed on some. Very smooth with a great finish. This is about half the beer that the first one was which isn't necessarily a bad thing. This is smooth enough to drink a few pints of without feeling like you just conquered the neighboring tribe by brute force. I fully recommend it. Per the usual Sam Smith output, it is perfectly balanced and a great entrance into this particular beer style.
Overall rating: 4.75. Excellent beer. Period. I love Sam Smith. He hasn't let me down yet. I need to buy stock. Or move to Yorkshire, England and rent a room above the brewery. How many quid is that I wonder? Anyone have an extra pence or two lying around?
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
2012 Oscars!!! Here is my review of the films nominated for best picture!
This years Oscars look to be more low key with less big name movies nominated then I can remember in a long time. The nominees for best picture are:
The Artists
The Descendants
Extrememly Loud and Incredibly Close
The Help
Hugo
Midnight in Paris
Moneyball
The Tree of Life
War Horse
I have seen four of these films so far. The first one I watched was "The Help." The film chronicled the struggles of the servants in Jackson, Mississippi during the 1960's. Emmas Stone plays an author who wants to write a book from the perspective of a black housekeeper. Interweaving the fiction with reality, the film does a very good job of expressing just how dismal things were back then even as the civil rights movement hit full stride. I thought it was a very good film overall; the acting was good, the story superb, the cinematography was adequate. I look for this to be a front-runner at this year's awards. Io bet this has a 1/2 chance to win.
The second film I saw was "The Tree of Life." This film was directed by Terrance Mallick and pushed the boundaries of what a film can be. With very little discernible plot or timeline, the film focused more extensively on the emotions of the characters and the themes presented by the plot. It will not give anything away to say that a family finds out one of their sons has passed away and the film then shows what has led up to this and what feelings are expressed as a result of the death. The actual event is never shown, I don't even remember finding out how the son died. The plot and actual events are truly secondary in this film. Even as this film challenges the traditional beginning/ middle/ end of traditional film making, it does a great job addressing the themes addressed by the screenwriter and director. Using some of the most beautiful cinematography to date, it captures each characters moods, emotions, and beliefs without truly filming a conventional scene. It is almost a series of impressionistic paintings shown in conjunction with a central idea to express the ides the director wants us to see which are quite open to interpretation even after the film ends. It was a very interesting (and slightly tedious- especially then middle 25 or 30 minutes with no humans appearing at all) look at how a film can get its message across while still managing to be called a film. I don't think it will win; it is too avant-garde for the academy to pick and rightfully so. I give this a 1/10 chance to win.
The third film I have watched was "Moneyball." It starred Brad Pitt as Billy Beane, the Oakland A's general manager who changed the thinking in baseball by embracing the ideology of Bill James, the Godfather of statistics. While it was slightly entertaining, I have no idea why it was chosen for best picture. The cinematography was repetitious, the acting was OK if you buy Brad Pitt's interpretation of Billy Beane as a charismatic, swashbuckling, GM who didn't seem to care about his paycheck or his livelihood (which I did not). The screenplay was overwrought with Hollywood shtick and reeked of conventions best left in the 80's and 90's (can we have another close-up of Brad Pitt brooding in his pick-up truck? Please just one more.) I will say Jonah Hill did a great job of playing the anti-Jonah Hill assistant GM; Peter Brand. His performance saved the film. In short, this is a mildly entertaining look at the Hollywood version of baseball culture that somehow didn't ring authentic to me at all. I wouldn't recommend watching it to be honest and if you do, please do so with a grain of salt and a bottle of Pepcid AC as it may upset your stomach. Not a chance to win.
The fourth film I saw was "Hugo." It is about a boy, Hugo, who lives in a train station as he has been orphaned. Directed by Martin Scorcese, the cinamatography was excellent as was the story. Hugo meets one of the pioneers of filmmaking, Goerges Melies (portrayed by an outstanding Ben Kingsley) and the story unfolds from there. While serving as a film history lesson, the script manages to maintain its focus on being a "kid movie" while not overtly feeling like one. This is the first "kids movie" that has been nominated that actually should have been. I recommend it to everyone, young and old for the script, beautiful special effects, perfect period costumes and makeup, great performances by Kingsley and Sasha Baren Cohen, and the fantastic lesson in early filmmaking and the pioneering effects that Melies and the Lumiere Brothers had on filmmaking. Had the Oscars not alreay taken place, I would have moved this right next to "The Help" as my front-runner for the Oscar. Next up, I am watching "The Descendants" tonight and am expecting an outstanding film. I have heard nothing but good and am really looking forward to it.
The Artists
The Descendants
Extrememly Loud and Incredibly Close
The Help
Hugo
Midnight in Paris
Moneyball
The Tree of Life
War Horse
I have seen four of these films so far. The first one I watched was "The Help." The film chronicled the struggles of the servants in Jackson, Mississippi during the 1960's. Emmas Stone plays an author who wants to write a book from the perspective of a black housekeeper. Interweaving the fiction with reality, the film does a very good job of expressing just how dismal things were back then even as the civil rights movement hit full stride. I thought it was a very good film overall; the acting was good, the story superb, the cinematography was adequate. I look for this to be a front-runner at this year's awards. Io bet this has a 1/2 chance to win.
The second film I saw was "The Tree of Life." This film was directed by Terrance Mallick and pushed the boundaries of what a film can be. With very little discernible plot or timeline, the film focused more extensively on the emotions of the characters and the themes presented by the plot. It will not give anything away to say that a family finds out one of their sons has passed away and the film then shows what has led up to this and what feelings are expressed as a result of the death. The actual event is never shown, I don't even remember finding out how the son died. The plot and actual events are truly secondary in this film. Even as this film challenges the traditional beginning/ middle/ end of traditional film making, it does a great job addressing the themes addressed by the screenwriter and director. Using some of the most beautiful cinematography to date, it captures each characters moods, emotions, and beliefs without truly filming a conventional scene. It is almost a series of impressionistic paintings shown in conjunction with a central idea to express the ides the director wants us to see which are quite open to interpretation even after the film ends. It was a very interesting (and slightly tedious- especially then middle 25 or 30 minutes with no humans appearing at all) look at how a film can get its message across while still managing to be called a film. I don't think it will win; it is too avant-garde for the academy to pick and rightfully so. I give this a 1/10 chance to win.
The third film I have watched was "Moneyball." It starred Brad Pitt as Billy Beane, the Oakland A's general manager who changed the thinking in baseball by embracing the ideology of Bill James, the Godfather of statistics. While it was slightly entertaining, I have no idea why it was chosen for best picture. The cinematography was repetitious, the acting was OK if you buy Brad Pitt's interpretation of Billy Beane as a charismatic, swashbuckling, GM who didn't seem to care about his paycheck or his livelihood (which I did not). The screenplay was overwrought with Hollywood shtick and reeked of conventions best left in the 80's and 90's (can we have another close-up of Brad Pitt brooding in his pick-up truck? Please just one more.) I will say Jonah Hill did a great job of playing the anti-Jonah Hill assistant GM; Peter Brand. His performance saved the film. In short, this is a mildly entertaining look at the Hollywood version of baseball culture that somehow didn't ring authentic to me at all. I wouldn't recommend watching it to be honest and if you do, please do so with a grain of salt and a bottle of Pepcid AC as it may upset your stomach. Not a chance to win.
The fourth film I saw was "Hugo." It is about a boy, Hugo, who lives in a train station as he has been orphaned. Directed by Martin Scorcese, the cinamatography was excellent as was the story. Hugo meets one of the pioneers of filmmaking, Goerges Melies (portrayed by an outstanding Ben Kingsley) and the story unfolds from there. While serving as a film history lesson, the script manages to maintain its focus on being a "kid movie" while not overtly feeling like one. This is the first "kids movie" that has been nominated that actually should have been. I recommend it to everyone, young and old for the script, beautiful special effects, perfect period costumes and makeup, great performances by Kingsley and Sasha Baren Cohen, and the fantastic lesson in early filmmaking and the pioneering effects that Melies and the Lumiere Brothers had on filmmaking. Had the Oscars not alreay taken place, I would have moved this right next to "The Help" as my front-runner for the Oscar. Next up, I am watching "The Descendants" tonight and am expecting an outstanding film. I have heard nothing but good and am really looking forward to it.
Friday, February 3, 2012
Friday 2/2 BLOG!
In honor of Valentine's Day, Clark Dooley and I have decided to do some candy flavored beer research so Clark bought a bottle of Boulevard Chocolate Ale and I picked up two bottles of Chocolate Stout. We decided to drink the Boulevard Chocolate Ale first.
Brewer: Boulevard Brewing Company, Kansas City
Beer: Boulevard Smokestack Series Chocolate Ale
Style: Ale albeit 9.1% alcohol
Price: $12.99 for a pint bottle- not cheap
Clark claims that all of his KC homies are going crazy for this so he had to try it. Here are the ratings:
Appearance: Amber Caramely Smoky- not clear at all.
Mouthfeel: Kind of prickly, very bubbly.
Smell: surprisingly weak- can't really smell anything. Clark smells malt but it is not strong.
Taste: Definitely malty; the label says it is a malt beverage so I guess that makes sense. As for the chocolate, it is very apparent at the beginning of the drink but disappears quickly. I am not a fan to be honest; especially for $13 a pint. Not a real good start. Amy said it was like McEwans with sugar. John says that the four pale ales may have dulled his taste buds but he wants to know where the chocolate is. Clark says his homies can keep it in KC.
Overall rating: I say a 2.5 Clark says a 1.75. Not a stellar start.
Sidenote: Michelle is putting lip gloss on right now. Watch out TP holders. By the way, if you ever invite Michelle over, hide the wine.
On to the second!!!
Brewer: Rogue Brewery (usually a solid brewer- haven't had a bad one yet)
Beer Name: Rogue Chocolate Stout
Beer Style: Chocolate Stout
Price: $6.99 if memory serves correctly
Appearance: Looks like beer. Very dark. Almost black. Slight head; good lacing on the glass.
Mouthfeel: Very smooth but substanial. A nice feel.
Smell: Again, not a very strong smell. I'm starting to wonder if I have a cold. What I can smell is a slight chocolate smell with a hint of some kind of nuts.
Taste: Ummmmmmmmmmm. Now we have a beer. This is good stuff. Definitely more chocolaty and beery. Very smooth and the chocolate starts strong and fades into a slightly bitter aftertaste. The stout taste is smooth and not too bitter. It is a balanced beer which tastes good from start to finish. I recommend it highly for your Valentine's Day drinking. Clark says very choclatey, not cocoaey... Good beer.
Overall Rating: I say 3.5, Clark says 3.5 also. Good stuff.
And the last Chocolate beer for the night...
Brewer: Wells and Youngs Brewery, England
Beer Name: Young's Double Chocolate Stout
Beer Style: Chocolate Stout
Price: Want to say $5.99 but not for sure.
Appearance: Dark, choclatey, can't see through it at all.
Mouthfeel: Tingly, somewhat flat feel to it.
Smell: Smells like black licorice to me; sort of an anise smell.
Taste: Very smooth as well here. This is a professionally made beer as well. A little more bitter then the Rogue and slightly more malty. Clark doesn't care for the malt. We both agree that it is good but not quite as good as the Rogue.
SIDENOTE: Manchester United beat Chelsea in the 94 FA Cup final. Cantona scored twice from the spot. Programming note: United beats Chelsea Sunday AM on Fox. Better then the Super Bowl. Tune in.
BONUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My bro in law, Erick has decided to brew his own beer. He gave me a sample beer of each kind tonight and I told him I would review both on the blog tonight. Here goes!!!!
BREWER: Erick Todd brewing company
BEER NAME: Bo Pellini sucks nuts brown ale
Beer Style: Nut brown ale
Price: Ask Erick
Appearance: Ummm brown, cloudy, very bubbly
Mouthfeel: Smooth with a bubbly undertone, kind of champagney
Smell: Somewhat sweet in a mixed vegetableish way; can't say I've ever smelled this smell before- not necessarily bad- just very different
Taste: Very smooth- somewhat bland but we have been drinking chocolate stout for the last two hours as well so anything beneath paint thinner is going to be bland at this time. I think this would make Bo Pellini proud; if he wasn't a walking vagina... which he is. Go Penn State! And Michigan, Ohio St., Minnesota, Northwestern etc. Clark says go Illinois and Wisconsin and anyone we forgot.
Overall rating: Not bad. I'm going to have to shorten the name of the beer to retain blog space. From here on out, we are referring to it simply as "Bo Pellini sucks nuts". I give the "Bo Pellini Sucks Nuts" a 3.0. A good effort for a first time brewer. Gives me hope for future offerings. Clark says a good Newcastle feel; 3.2 overall.
BREWER: Erick Todd Brewery
BEER NAME: Erick's Wheatholer Ale
BEER STYLE: Wheat Ale
PRICE: Ask Erick (less then the Boulevard chocolate- that Clark can gaurantee)
SIDENOTE: CLark and I love to say Peter "SCHMIECHEL" Say it a few times-"SCHMIECHEL, SCHMIECHEL, SCHMIECHEL" See, I told you. And try to sound German. Makes it even funner.
Appearance: Light golden and very clear. Looks like a very summery beer.
Mouthfeel: Clark says slightly resembles alka seltzer. I think it is bubbly also. But only up front. Smooths out as it goes down. A good feel to it overall.
Smell: Clark says enticing. Very fruity. I say bubblegummy with a hint of baby poop. Or bananas; whichever.
Tatse: Clark says OOOhhh, ummm, and nothing else. Waiting... waiting... nothing. Clark says it tastes bubbly. Maybe the four pale ales have gotten him after all. Oh wait, he says it needs to sit a couple, two years. After a few drinks, I am pleasantly surprised. This doesn't taste like it smells. It is good. I could drink this all summer long. Has a hint of Belgium in it; especially the aftertaste. A very complex wheat beer that is light enough to please most palates but complex enough to keep your interest. File this away under "keeper" (unlike Taylor Martinez to the NFL scouts).
Overall rating: I'm going 3.5 with the potential to increase given a 6 pack in the driveway at a later date. Clark says the Stroh's factory farted out a 3 for this one. Obviously, I'm not making that up...
Good job Erick. Looking forward to the new one that you are brewing tonight. Hope you have as much fun making it as I had drinking these. And listening to Clark's pearls of alcohol wisdom...
Until next time, thanks for reading. Two oatmeal stouts coming next unless I finish the Scotch Ale blog I started last weekend. I LOVE SCOTCH ALE...
Brewer: Boulevard Brewing Company, Kansas City
Beer: Boulevard Smokestack Series Chocolate Ale
Style: Ale albeit 9.1% alcohol
Price: $12.99 for a pint bottle- not cheap
Clark claims that all of his KC homies are going crazy for this so he had to try it. Here are the ratings:
Appearance: Amber Caramely Smoky- not clear at all.
Mouthfeel: Kind of prickly, very bubbly.
Smell: surprisingly weak- can't really smell anything. Clark smells malt but it is not strong.
Taste: Definitely malty; the label says it is a malt beverage so I guess that makes sense. As for the chocolate, it is very apparent at the beginning of the drink but disappears quickly. I am not a fan to be honest; especially for $13 a pint. Not a real good start. Amy said it was like McEwans with sugar. John says that the four pale ales may have dulled his taste buds but he wants to know where the chocolate is. Clark says his homies can keep it in KC.
Overall rating: I say a 2.5 Clark says a 1.75. Not a stellar start.
Sidenote: Michelle is putting lip gloss on right now. Watch out TP holders. By the way, if you ever invite Michelle over, hide the wine.
On to the second!!!
Brewer: Rogue Brewery (usually a solid brewer- haven't had a bad one yet)
Beer Name: Rogue Chocolate Stout
Beer Style: Chocolate Stout
Price: $6.99 if memory serves correctly
Appearance: Looks like beer. Very dark. Almost black. Slight head; good lacing on the glass.
Mouthfeel: Very smooth but substanial. A nice feel.
Smell: Again, not a very strong smell. I'm starting to wonder if I have a cold. What I can smell is a slight chocolate smell with a hint of some kind of nuts.
Taste: Ummmmmmmmmmm. Now we have a beer. This is good stuff. Definitely more chocolaty and beery. Very smooth and the chocolate starts strong and fades into a slightly bitter aftertaste. The stout taste is smooth and not too bitter. It is a balanced beer which tastes good from start to finish. I recommend it highly for your Valentine's Day drinking. Clark says very choclatey, not cocoaey... Good beer.
Overall Rating: I say 3.5, Clark says 3.5 also. Good stuff.
And the last Chocolate beer for the night...
Brewer: Wells and Youngs Brewery, England
Beer Name: Young's Double Chocolate Stout
Beer Style: Chocolate Stout
Price: Want to say $5.99 but not for sure.
Appearance: Dark, choclatey, can't see through it at all.
Mouthfeel: Tingly, somewhat flat feel to it.
Smell: Smells like black licorice to me; sort of an anise smell.
Taste: Very smooth as well here. This is a professionally made beer as well. A little more bitter then the Rogue and slightly more malty. Clark doesn't care for the malt. We both agree that it is good but not quite as good as the Rogue.
SIDENOTE: Manchester United beat Chelsea in the 94 FA Cup final. Cantona scored twice from the spot. Programming note: United beats Chelsea Sunday AM on Fox. Better then the Super Bowl. Tune in.
BONUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My bro in law, Erick has decided to brew his own beer. He gave me a sample beer of each kind tonight and I told him I would review both on the blog tonight. Here goes!!!!
BREWER: Erick Todd brewing company
BEER NAME: Bo Pellini sucks nuts brown ale
Beer Style: Nut brown ale
Price: Ask Erick
Appearance: Ummm brown, cloudy, very bubbly
Mouthfeel: Smooth with a bubbly undertone, kind of champagney
Smell: Somewhat sweet in a mixed vegetableish way; can't say I've ever smelled this smell before- not necessarily bad- just very different
Taste: Very smooth- somewhat bland but we have been drinking chocolate stout for the last two hours as well so anything beneath paint thinner is going to be bland at this time. I think this would make Bo Pellini proud; if he wasn't a walking vagina... which he is. Go Penn State! And Michigan, Ohio St., Minnesota, Northwestern etc. Clark says go Illinois and Wisconsin and anyone we forgot.
Overall rating: Not bad. I'm going to have to shorten the name of the beer to retain blog space. From here on out, we are referring to it simply as "Bo Pellini sucks nuts". I give the "Bo Pellini Sucks Nuts" a 3.0. A good effort for a first time brewer. Gives me hope for future offerings. Clark says a good Newcastle feel; 3.2 overall.
BREWER: Erick Todd Brewery
BEER NAME: Erick's Wheatholer Ale
BEER STYLE: Wheat Ale
PRICE: Ask Erick (less then the Boulevard chocolate- that Clark can gaurantee)
SIDENOTE: CLark and I love to say Peter "SCHMIECHEL" Say it a few times-"SCHMIECHEL, SCHMIECHEL, SCHMIECHEL" See, I told you. And try to sound German. Makes it even funner.
Appearance: Light golden and very clear. Looks like a very summery beer.
Mouthfeel: Clark says slightly resembles alka seltzer. I think it is bubbly also. But only up front. Smooths out as it goes down. A good feel to it overall.
Smell: Clark says enticing. Very fruity. I say bubblegummy with a hint of baby poop. Or bananas; whichever.
Tatse: Clark says OOOhhh, ummm, and nothing else. Waiting... waiting... nothing. Clark says it tastes bubbly. Maybe the four pale ales have gotten him after all. Oh wait, he says it needs to sit a couple, two years. After a few drinks, I am pleasantly surprised. This doesn't taste like it smells. It is good. I could drink this all summer long. Has a hint of Belgium in it; especially the aftertaste. A very complex wheat beer that is light enough to please most palates but complex enough to keep your interest. File this away under "keeper" (unlike Taylor Martinez to the NFL scouts).
Overall rating: I'm going 3.5 with the potential to increase given a 6 pack in the driveway at a later date. Clark says the Stroh's factory farted out a 3 for this one. Obviously, I'm not making that up...
Good job Erick. Looking forward to the new one that you are brewing tonight. Hope you have as much fun making it as I had drinking these. And listening to Clark's pearls of alcohol wisdom...
Until next time, thanks for reading. Two oatmeal stouts coming next unless I finish the Scotch Ale blog I started last weekend. I LOVE SCOTCH ALE...
Saturday, January 14, 2012
XMas 2011 Beer Showdown
Welcome back to me!!!! After a long hiatus, I am back and better then ever (or at least as good/ bad as I was before)... Anyways, enjoy the new music I have posted on the page. I have picked some old fashioned Irish drinking music from HBO's "The Wire." Great TV show, great artist, great song. Enjoy.
If you are not a fan of the Wire, go straight to Blockbuster/ Netflix/ where ever and rent it. Watch all 60 episodes and then join with the crowd who has seen the best TV show ever.
And after my shameless plug, on to the beer!!! Tonight I am drinking two bottles of XMas ale; one from Great Britian and one from Belgium. The British beer is the Samuel Smith Winter Welcome Ale. I am going to add their website to my sidebar when I am done here. To date, they are the only brewer to earn a perfect "5" rating for a beer (India Ale) and it has withstood the test of time. I just drank some at Kevin's about a month ago and it was outstanding. There is a 4 pack in the fridge right now as a matter of fact. UMMMMMMM. I might get crunked up tonight! If only my wife was home for some lovin'! She is scrapbooking the entire weekend. Whoooohoooo! Bring hime some pretty pages hun. Miss you!
I will get to the second beer later in the post so without further ado...
Brewer: Samuel Smith, England
Beer Name: Winter Welcome Ale
Beer Style: Winter Ale
Price: Can't remember as I bought it before I got the awful head/chest cold that has kept me from drinking the last couple weeks. Maybe $5 for the pint; probably less.
Here is the rating:
Appearance: Light Amber, very clear for a beer; I can actually see things through it.
Mouthfeel: Slightly fizzy, a medium body, good overall.
Smell: My nose is still a little off but it has a hint of citrus behind the hops which dominate. A very strong aroma that reminds me of the Griswold family XMas tree. A very nice winter beer aroma.
Taste: No surprise here but the hops are the predominant flavor. Not nearly as bitter as the India Ale but much more then your average beer; not a lot of citrus taste to match the smell but it is very smooth. Very smooth and refreshing. Like drinking snowflakes (wow- poetic and cheesy). I'm digging this a lot (part of it could be the fact that I haven't drank anything in two weeks or so. Paint thinner in a rusty Colt 45 can might be good tonight). Regardless, this is a repeat buy for me; next time I'm at Friar Tuck's, I'm going to grab some more.
Overall rating: 4.5-could be slightly fuller bodied for me (read more hops) but overall a very nice beer. I have yet to taste a bad beer from Samuel Smith and they are quickly becoming an old faithful to me. I would recommend anything they brew; even if I haven't tasted it. This is going to be stiff competition for the next beer:
COMMERCIAL: JUST CALLED SQUARE ONE BREWERY- SCOTCH ALE COMES IN 1/20 (OR THEREABOUTS). ANYONE FOR A TRIP TO SOUTH CITY? I NEED A GROWLER OR THREE FOR THE FRIDGE...
Back to the regularily scheduled beer blog:
Brewer: St. Bernadus
Beer Name: St. Bernadus Christmas Ale
Beer Style: Winter/ XMas Ale
Price: Don't know. This beer was given to me last XMas by Goose. The label says that it can be aged up to 15 years and still be enjoyed by the most discriminating connoisseurs. (Really, it says that). By the way, THANKS GOOSE. You and I are going to do the blog for the beer you gave me this XMas along with the beer I'm giving you. Let me know when you are available and I'll drive down and spend the night in the guest room. Kelly- before you start, remember you are scrapbooking ALL FRICKING WEEKEND!!!!!! XOXO...
I just finished the Sam Smith- man that was good and I have a buzz already... And in the red corner: the challenger St. Bernardus!!! The bottle is entering the arena. "Fight Like a Brave" by the Chili Peppers is blaring on the PA. Let's get it aaawwwwwnnnnnnnnnnn!
Appearance: Medium brown but very cloudy; not checking out my Playboy through this glass; just kidding honey- I'm reading The Wall Street Journal!
Smell: Bubblegum- really. Possibly the weirdest beer smell ever. It smells like cotton candy. I am having my 9 year old smell it right now. Nick, after much prodding, smelled it and when I asked if it smelled like bubblegum, he smiled and said, Kind of, yeah- can I try it?" I sent him back to the kitchen. Justin just took a whiff and said "AWAAACCKKK- it smells like a bunch of alcohol- it makes me want to throw up." If only that would continue through high school...
Mouthfeel: Very substantial. A very thick beer. I king of have to gnaw on it.
Taste: Very, very wierd but Belgiun. (Sidenote- Nick just told me he wants to start a sweater blog by the way. I'm not really sure why.) Back to the beer. It is very sweet but actually tastes pretty good. The typical Belgiun aftertaste is parte of the real taste and doesn't linger. I actually like it quite a bit. And, it's 10% alcohol (CRUNKED UP YA'LL). But, for a 10% beer, it does a good job of masking the alcohol taste. I am going to have to drink more of this before giving the overall rating. Be back in a bit. (I'll publish now and edit later).
Overall rating: After much deliberation and the full bottle, I'll say a 4.0. Best Belgiun beer I have tried. Very sweet but very drinkable. I will buy another bottle next XMas for sure.
And, until the next one, thanks for reading. I have some Sam Smith IPA to drink :)
If you are not a fan of the Wire, go straight to Blockbuster/ Netflix/ where ever and rent it. Watch all 60 episodes and then join with the crowd who has seen the best TV show ever.
And after my shameless plug, on to the beer!!! Tonight I am drinking two bottles of XMas ale; one from Great Britian and one from Belgium. The British beer is the Samuel Smith Winter Welcome Ale. I am going to add their website to my sidebar when I am done here. To date, they are the only brewer to earn a perfect "5" rating for a beer (India Ale) and it has withstood the test of time. I just drank some at Kevin's about a month ago and it was outstanding. There is a 4 pack in the fridge right now as a matter of fact. UMMMMMMM. I might get crunked up tonight! If only my wife was home for some lovin'! She is scrapbooking the entire weekend. Whoooohoooo! Bring hime some pretty pages hun. Miss you!
I will get to the second beer later in the post so without further ado...
Brewer: Samuel Smith, England
Beer Name: Winter Welcome Ale
Beer Style: Winter Ale
Price: Can't remember as I bought it before I got the awful head/chest cold that has kept me from drinking the last couple weeks. Maybe $5 for the pint; probably less.
Here is the rating:
Appearance: Light Amber, very clear for a beer; I can actually see things through it.
Mouthfeel: Slightly fizzy, a medium body, good overall.
Smell: My nose is still a little off but it has a hint of citrus behind the hops which dominate. A very strong aroma that reminds me of the Griswold family XMas tree. A very nice winter beer aroma.
Taste: No surprise here but the hops are the predominant flavor. Not nearly as bitter as the India Ale but much more then your average beer; not a lot of citrus taste to match the smell but it is very smooth. Very smooth and refreshing. Like drinking snowflakes (wow- poetic and cheesy). I'm digging this a lot (part of it could be the fact that I haven't drank anything in two weeks or so. Paint thinner in a rusty Colt 45 can might be good tonight). Regardless, this is a repeat buy for me; next time I'm at Friar Tuck's, I'm going to grab some more.
Overall rating: 4.5-could be slightly fuller bodied for me (read more hops) but overall a very nice beer. I have yet to taste a bad beer from Samuel Smith and they are quickly becoming an old faithful to me. I would recommend anything they brew; even if I haven't tasted it. This is going to be stiff competition for the next beer:
COMMERCIAL: JUST CALLED SQUARE ONE BREWERY- SCOTCH ALE COMES IN 1/20 (OR THEREABOUTS). ANYONE FOR A TRIP TO SOUTH CITY? I NEED A GROWLER OR THREE FOR THE FRIDGE...
Back to the regularily scheduled beer blog:
Brewer: St. Bernadus
Beer Name: St. Bernadus Christmas Ale
Beer Style: Winter/ XMas Ale
Price: Don't know. This beer was given to me last XMas by Goose. The label says that it can be aged up to 15 years and still be enjoyed by the most discriminating connoisseurs. (Really, it says that). By the way, THANKS GOOSE. You and I are going to do the blog for the beer you gave me this XMas along with the beer I'm giving you. Let me know when you are available and I'll drive down and spend the night in the guest room. Kelly- before you start, remember you are scrapbooking ALL FRICKING WEEKEND!!!!!! XOXO...
I just finished the Sam Smith- man that was good and I have a buzz already... And in the red corner: the challenger St. Bernardus!!! The bottle is entering the arena. "Fight Like a Brave" by the Chili Peppers is blaring on the PA. Let's get it aaawwwwwnnnnnnnnnnn!
Appearance: Medium brown but very cloudy; not checking out my Playboy through this glass; just kidding honey- I'm reading The Wall Street Journal!
Smell: Bubblegum- really. Possibly the weirdest beer smell ever. It smells like cotton candy. I am having my 9 year old smell it right now. Nick, after much prodding, smelled it and when I asked if it smelled like bubblegum, he smiled and said, Kind of, yeah- can I try it?" I sent him back to the kitchen. Justin just took a whiff and said "AWAAACCKKK- it smells like a bunch of alcohol- it makes me want to throw up." If only that would continue through high school...
Mouthfeel: Very substantial. A very thick beer. I king of have to gnaw on it.
Taste: Very, very wierd but Belgiun. (Sidenote- Nick just told me he wants to start a sweater blog by the way. I'm not really sure why.) Back to the beer. It is very sweet but actually tastes pretty good. The typical Belgiun aftertaste is parte of the real taste and doesn't linger. I actually like it quite a bit. And, it's 10% alcohol (CRUNKED UP YA'LL). But, for a 10% beer, it does a good job of masking the alcohol taste. I am going to have to drink more of this before giving the overall rating. Be back in a bit. (I'll publish now and edit later).
Overall rating: After much deliberation and the full bottle, I'll say a 4.0. Best Belgiun beer I have tried. Very sweet but very drinkable. I will buy another bottle next XMas for sure.
And, until the next one, thanks for reading. I have some Sam Smith IPA to drink :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)